{"id":2305,"date":"2017-01-20T08:54:36","date_gmt":"2017-01-20T07:54:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305"},"modified":"2017-01-20T09:23:55","modified_gmt":"2017-01-20T08:23:55","slug":"chinese-gdp-still-too-easy-to-forecast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305","title":{"rendered":"Chinese GDP \u2013 still (too) easy to forecast"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>China\u2019s GDP increased by 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to one year earlier and by 6.7 percent in 2016 as a whole compared to 2015. These results are more or less exactly in line with my own and average market expectations &#8211; and not bad if close to reality. This we don\u2019t know very well. But we do know that China\u2019s political leadership nowadays preferably wants to focus on the quality of economic growth and not on the numbers per se; in this context, one can see a continuous increasing production share of the service sector, now almost 52 percent of GDP. Many analysts, however, still do not know how to apply this distinction of growth quality \u2013 and obviously not on this publication day either. It should also be noted that the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) speaks about \u201ca complicated domestic <em>and<\/em> international environment\u201d, i.e. in China, too.<\/p>\n<p>Compared to the GDP accounting of the National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS) itself one year ago, I hardly see major qualitative improvements. This may be the wrong conclusion when considering all the positive comments on this issue that are made by the Chinese and certain foreigners. Still, however, more progress seems to be necessary as regards GDP calculations from the production side. GDP calculations from the expenditure side \u2013 which we are mostly used to in our part of the world \u2013 are still insufficient as well, only being published <em>annually <\/em>and only in nominal prices; and <em>quarterly<\/em> GDP numbers are only calculated from the production side in volume terms (surf on IMF SDDS, China about the different calculation types &#8211; hopefully updated).<\/p>\n<p>It should be kept in mind that the above-mentioned forecasting accuracy is not the result of special forecasting skills. It is caused because of the still existing phenomenon that GDP outcomes in China should \u2013 more or less \u2013 meet or have to meet official objectives and forecasts. Consequently, paying attention to what officials say about the GDP future usually serves as a good guidance.<\/p>\n<p>One may even conclude that more and stronger statistical fluctuations of Chinese GDP growth potentially may contribute to better credibility of Chinese statistics. One specific problem remains all the same: There is a risk that statistical improvements at some point \u2013 when they finally happen \u2013 will not be acknowledged on time even if it seems to be justified.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, it should be reminded that president Xi Jinping a couple of weeks ago told economic decision makers of the Communist Party that he is ready to abandon the current growth objective of 6 \u00bd percent if reaching this growth number should add too much to debt and stability problems. Thus, we have got another GDP-growth issue to observe in the future: the development of economic and financial risks (as much as possible). It makes sense!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.lnu.se\/image.ashx?id=117818&amp;w=110\" alt=\"\" width=\"110\" height=\"136\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Hubert Fromlet<\/em><\/strong><em><br \/>\n<\/em>Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University<br \/>\n<a href=\"..\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial board<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\">Back to Start Page<\/a><em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>China\u2019s GDP increased by 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to one year earlier and by 6.7 percent in 2016 as a whole compared to 2015. These results are more or less exactly in line with my own and average market expectations &#8211; and not bad if close to reality. This we [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":174,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13398],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\r\n<title>Chinese GDP \u2013 still (too) easy to forecast - China Research<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chinese GDP \u2013 still (too) easy to forecast - China Research\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"China\u2019s GDP increased by 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to one year earlier and by 6.7 percent in 2016 as a whole compared to 2015. These results are more or less exactly in line with my own and average market expectations &#8211; and not bad if close to reality. This we [&hellip;]\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China Research\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-01-20T07:54:36+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-20T08:23:55+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/image.lnu.se\/image.ashx?id=117818&amp;w=110\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hubert Fromlet, Kalmar\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hubert Fromlet, Kalmar\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305\",\"name\":\"Chinese GDP \u2013 still (too) easy to forecast - China Research\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-20T07:54:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-20T08:23:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#\/schema\/person\/7dbc3e79d44dfa0d6bb4e1f625ad2ae5\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/\",\"name\":\"China Research\",\"description\":\"A discussion forum on emerging markets, mainly China  \u2013                                          from a macro, micro, institutional and corporate angle.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#\/schema\/person\/7dbc3e79d44dfa0d6bb4e1f625ad2ae5\",\"name\":\"Hubert Fromlet, Kalmar\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?author=174\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chinese GDP \u2013 still (too) easy to forecast - China Research","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chinese GDP \u2013 still (too) easy to forecast - China Research","og_description":"China\u2019s GDP increased by 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to one year earlier and by 6.7 percent in 2016 as a whole compared to 2015. These results are more or less exactly in line with my own and average market expectations &#8211; and not bad if close to reality. This we [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305","og_site_name":"China Research","article_published_time":"2017-01-20T07:54:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-20T08:23:55+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/image.lnu.se\/image.ashx?id=117818&amp;w=110"}],"author":"Hubert Fromlet, Kalmar","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hubert Fromlet, Kalmar","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305","url":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305","name":"Chinese GDP \u2013 still (too) easy to forecast - China Research","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-01-20T07:54:36+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-20T08:23:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#\/schema\/person\/7dbc3e79d44dfa0d6bb4e1f625ad2ae5"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?p=2305"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/","name":"China Research","description":"A discussion forum on emerging markets, mainly China  \u2013                                          from a macro, micro, institutional and corporate angle.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/#\/schema\/person\/7dbc3e79d44dfa0d6bb4e1f625ad2ae5","name":"Hubert Fromlet, Kalmar","url":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/?author=174"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/174"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2305"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2308,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305\/revisions\/2308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}