![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/files\/2012\/03\/Sean-Dougherty.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Sean Dougherty<\/strong><\/em> <\/p>\n
\nSenior Economist and Head of the OECD\u2019s Mexico Desk
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/files\/2012\/01\/home-small.gif\")
<\/a> ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogg.lnu.se\/china-research\/files\/2012\/01\/home-small-grey.gif\")
<\/a><\/strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n
Mexico has emerged as an emerging markets darling, with some editorials praising it as the “New China”. Is this a fair assessment? While it is true that Mexico’s wage cost competitiveness has improved relative to China, its broader productivity record has been very weak in recent years. Slow productivity growth has been limited by a lack of full implementation of earlier reforms, and difficulty in passing reforms in key remaining areas. The reform record of the past several months is encouraging — even astonishing — in its scope. Major reforms have been made to boost competition in telecoms, strengthen the education system, improve labor market flexibility and make local governments more accountable. Moreover, these reforms are not just incremental reforms: even \u201cpainful\u201d and substantial constitutional changes are being passed, such as the telecommunications reform that was approved by state legislatures a few weeks ago. Many of these reforms the OECD has long advocated in its policy advice, notably in its Economic Surveys.<\/p>\n
The gamut of reforms that have been passed makes one wonder what is the secret to all of this reform? A key part of the answer is its “Pacto por Mexico”, a consensus-based commitment to pass a package of reforms. This political vehicle has reduced the political opportunity cost of passing difficult reforms, by ensuring that all major parties take responsibility for their passage. The politically savvy technocrats who designed the Pacto include a number of former legislators, and their experience has helped immensely.<\/p>\n
Economic growth has been too slow in recent decades to narrow the gap with the rest of the OECD, and it has been insufficiently inclusive to durably reduce poverty. This is mostly because the all-essential \u201cmultifactor\u201d productivity has been a negative contributor to growth, after accounting for demographics and capital accumulation. In the long run, productivity should be the primary source of growth. Reversing the stagnation in the income gap with the rest of the OECD, and reducing income inequality will require \u201cdeep\u201d structural reforms to address widespread informal employment and weaknesses in legal institutions, which diminish the effectiveness of many policies. These weaknesses particularly hold back gains in productivity, in part by limiting the scale of production and also by imposing barriers to reallocation.<\/p>\n
While there is no silver bullet to eliminate informality, new OECD evidence presented in the latest Survey suggests that a broad package of reforms can help immensely: strengthening educational outcomes, improving the regulatory environment and reducing corruption are all essential intermediate steps to do so. New legislation and regulatory reform are needed to remove remaining barriers to market entry \u2013 especially at the sub-national levels \u2013 as well as reduce corruption and make the justice system more effective. While these goals are partly addressed in the Pacto\u2019s commitments, policymakers must not be complacent, nor stop when the “going gets tough”. Ongoing reforms and follow-through are essential.<\/p>\n
The OECD\u2019s Survey recommends the creation of an ongoing high-level inter-agency body focused on productivity that can study and help to promote structural reform.<\/p>\n
Boosting productivity and achieving the range of competition reforms envisioned by the administration will require stronger judicial institutions to enforce laws and adjudicate disputes. Judicial effectiveness relies not only on legal origin, but also on the efficiency of the court system, the quality of administration, the nature of legal codes and the soundness of procedures. Analysis carried out in the context of this Economic Survey suggests that a low-quality judiciary makes contract enforcement problematic, reducing the size of firms and capital intensity, thus limiting overall productivity through diminished economies of scale. Major reforms to the civil and criminal judicial systems are underway, yet faster progress needs to be strived for.<\/p>\n
Those reforms that have been carried out in recent years have already improved Mexico\u2019s macroeconomic performance, helping to support the economy\u2019s solid recent growth record \u2013 which we believe will continue at a pace of about 3\u00bd percent \u2013 and increased its resilience to repeated international shocks. However, it is critical that the reform efforts don’t slow down, and implementation is not forgotten. Mexico has no time to lose. In order to durably raise living standards and well-being for all Mexicans, many more reforms are still needed, and considerable follow-through or implementation of previous reforms is still required in most policy areas.<\/p>\n
http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/eco\/surveys\/mexico-2013.htm<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Sean Dougherty<\/strong><\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\nSenior Economist and Head of the OECD\u2019s Mexico Desk
\n<\/a> <\/a><\/strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n