China Research

A discussion forum on emerging markets, mainly China – from a macro, micro, institutional and corporate angle.

Russia’s (almost) unobserved economy

September 16, 2025

Russia is causing these days – for well-known reasons – almost no headlines or analysis on its pure economic development in Western analysis. An exemption is the important work done by BOFIT in Helsinki which is an organization that still provides the world with updated analysis on the Russian economy. 

Obvious – and logical – economic slowdown 

According to BOFIT (The Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies), Russian economic growth remained slow also in July – but still the term “growth” is used in their latest report, and not the expression of a recession (https://www.bofit.fi/en/monitoring/weekly/2025/vw202537_1/ ). However, according to other judgments, Russia could now be on the edge of a recession or already slightly in it – an interpretation that recently partly has been rejected, for example, by the Russian central bank CBR (https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/russian-central-bank-cautiously-cuts-key-rate-by-100-bps-17-2025-09-12/ and https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2108234/russia-economy-meltdown-central-bank-gdp-tanking).

Anyway, the Russian economy looks very much like stagnating these days, reflecting a deterioration from previous more positive growth numbers (Q2:+1.1%; Q1:1.4% yoy, but down by 0,6% in the course of the first half of 2025 according to Reuters and the CBR).  

Interestingly, existing sluggish economic growth is mainly referred to still existing high interest rates as the main medicine against very high inflation and their negative impact on non-military investment. Poor economic results for many Russian companies also had – and probably still have – a negative impact on investment plans. On the other hand, government spending continues to grow and will do so in the future.

Altogether, the non-military part of the Russian economy has more recently – according to BOFIT – mainly been driven by private consumption. This is obviously confirmed by statistical numbers for retail sales and services – a development that is to some extent supported by relatively low unemployment.

Measured from the production side it can be summarized that industrial production remains more or less stagnating with rising production of commodities and shrinking output of quite some manufacturing goods – but with positive numbers for certain manufactured products such as transport and electronic equipment.

Summary: When studying forecasts on the Russian GDP, stagnation or in the best case only a very weak increase seems to be on the cards for 2025, indicating some further weakening in the forthcoming quarters and probably no visibly improved performance next year. But uncertainty – also statistical? – remains high in 2026.

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University

SCO – another example of Chinese long-term strategy

September 3, 2025

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) belongs to the international conventions that are hardly known in our part of the world. Though having been founded already in 2001, not very much has been reported from the 24 Heads of State Council meetings before the 25th SCO convention that took place recently in Tinjian.  The SCO Tianjin Summit 2025 has probably been the most important of its kind so far, due to the list of prominent participants and the burning international conflicts.

Long-term aspects more important than short-term results

Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), is an intergovernmental organization that has been started in 2001 by China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan aiming at peace and cooperation among its member states with the intention to promote what then was called a new fair political and economic order. Later on, also India, Pakistan and Iran joined the organization.

Totally, the SCO also includes quite a number of observer states from the Eurasian region. Around half of the global population is represented in the SCO which considers itself as an alternative to corresponding Western organizations .

According to the SCO, its main goals are defined as follows:

#  “to strengthen mutual trust, friendship and good-neighborliness between the Member States;

#  to encourage the effective cooperation between the Member States in such spheres as politics, trade, economy, science and technology, culture, education, energy, transport, tourism, environmental protection, etc;

#  to jointly ensure and maintain peace, security and stability in the region; and

# to promote a new democratic, fair and rational international political and economic international order”.

When reading these points above, one can easily observe their general and unbinding character – whatever this may mean. But now more co-operation among the member countries seems to be strived. This would allow China – the strongest member of the SCO – to pave the way for the continued development of the SCO (see https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/618965), certainly in line with its international long-term strategy. A parallel long-term strategy of this kind is also visible in other parts of the globe, for example in Africa, South America and the Pacific area. Russia’s role in the SCO seems to remain limited compared to China’s dominant position. India’s future impact on the SCO still appears unclear but closer relations to China seem to be on the cards. Trump’s tariffs could favor such a development even more than so far.    

Conclusion: China’s interest in the future of the SCO underlines again its long-term ambitions in the world – for reasons of political influence, new markets for its exports and the future supply with important commodities. By looking somewhat deeper into the SCO, we have got another example of China’s unique capacity to apply both short-term and long-term perspectives at the same time. A phenomenon that uses to come back regularly and that often is neglected in Western countries and companies..

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University

BRICS countries in trouble

August 15, 2025

Originally, BRIC was started as a financial investment idea in promising emerging markets. In other words, BRIC was in the beginning a financial construction for investing in well-growing emerging markets. B stood for Brazil, R for Russia, I for India and C for China. Later, also South Africa – representing the S in BRICS – was enabled to join.

New conditions

What initially seemed to be an interesting innovation, has in the meanwhile developed into a completely different and in many (financial) aspects into a financially obsolete product.

Growth and other economic conditions have changed profoundly since the start of BRICS. Chinese growth has been slowing down considerably, Russia suffers from burdening war effects, Brazil is economically unstable though recently improving somewhat and India, on the other hand, has more strongly moved in the right direction.

In other words: We have seen that the BRIC(S) countries did not have a homogeneous development in recent years. Rather the opposite – but not as a positive contribution in a diversification sense.   

More lately, BRICS countries have also suffered from President Trump’s tariffs and increasing global uncertainty about particularly emerging markets. These tendencies should lead to the question what may happen to BRICS in the future. Will BRICS recover as an important but not very powerful group of emerging markets or move into a different direction with China as an increasingly active driving force, favoring its own political interest and influence?

Conclusion:  My own guess is that the latter alternative seems to be the most probable one since China already since a number of years ago has demonstrated an increasing strategic political interest in modernizing emerging and less developed countries. These countries may be particularly relevant when they can provide China with important commodities.

We know by now that Chinese decision makers are excellent strategist both when it comes to short-term and long-term strategies.

BRICS fits well into this specific context.

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University