China Research

A discussion forum on emerging markets, mainly China – from a macro, micro, institutional and corporate angle.

India confirms its good GDP growth

March 19, 2026

India has more recently developed as a new favorite for many Western politicians and corporations. Even more when growth expectations were exceeded also in the final quarter of 2025, 7.8 percent compared to 7.2 that were expected. The outlook remains relatively favorable due to probable good resilience against ongoing exogenous distortions.

Where does GDP growth come from?

Obviously, India Is now receiving growing attention by analysts around the whole world. Good numerical GDP growth in India and China’s simultaneously somewhat distorted reputation in global media may serve as logical explanations. More lately, some interesting Indian developments could be observed.

First, it should be mentioned that GDP growth has been boosted by a technical revision, i.e. moving the base year from FY 2012 to FY 2023 (which in India is defined as a time horizon from April 1 to March 31). This structural revision means a stronger contribution to GDP from the modern technological part of the Indian economy compared to calculations from 20 years earlier. The revision took place after the IMF’s prompt to modernize the national account and looks as follows:

FY 2024   7.2 (new series)      9.2 (old series)

FY 2025   7.1 (new series)      6.5 (old series)

FY 2026   7.6 (new series)      7.4 (old series)

Second, both private consumption and gross investments are reported having grown by more than 7 percent in Q4. When considering that private consumption counts for 75 percent of Indian GDP and the slightly negative trend for net exports, the Indian investment ratio to GDP remains somewhat too low for a rapidly emerging country.

Third, GDP growth for Q2 got also a technical upward revision, from previously 8.2 to 8.4. Indian media report now proudly that India now has the fasted growing economy among the major countries.

Fourth, when watching more recent developments from the production side, technological progress seems indeed being an increasingly important driving force for manufacturing industries. Strong concentration on AI and telecommunication take also place in industrial production, increasingly also with foreign companies.

Fifth, Maharashtra is expected to be India’s wealthiest state also in FY2026 due to its diversified production structure with mainly manufacturing, services and infrastructure. Thus, GDP growth there should surpass national average. Mumbai, Pune and Nagpur stand for half of Maharashtra’s GDP and for around one fifth of India’s population.

Despite the promising outlook – don’t forget still existing risks!

When (financial) markets are favoring a certain (emerging) country, the remaining weaknesses and risks are often “forgotten”. This has, for example, been the case concerning China In almost the whole first quarter of this century. And even the future development of India’s economy is not without risks – despite all the opportunities.

Short-term risks that should be mentioned are, for example, the ongoing war in the Middle East with its impact on energy supply and inflation, American protectionism,  negative developments of remittance flows from abroad and, consequently, on the balance of current account.   

 Among the long-term (structural ) risks one can find particularly weak public finance and infrastructure, very uneven distribution of income, energy and environmental problems, bureaucracy, only slow improvements of private investment and productivity in major parts of the economy and the – in my understanding – still improvable business climate.

Very different psychology in India and Germany

Since I deal quite a lot with the economy of both countries, a striking psychological distinction between the two countries may be mentioned. This distinction could be described as follows:

¤ Germans see and discuss more frequently problems in the economy, having in difficult times rather a very skeptical or pessimistic view (which even can have a negative impact on economic growth via too reluctant consumers and investors).

¤ Indians on the other hand dislike normally to sound negative – at least when they are discussing the development of their country with foreigners. This may be a preferable psychological attitude compared to German skepticism but should be considered with some caution by foreign companies when planning activities in the promising – but to some extent still vulnerable – Indian market.

“New global conditions for emerging country analysis”

February 23, 2026

Summary of the Keynote Address by professor Hubert Fromlet at the IIF International Research Conference & Award Summit (IIF-IRCAS), February 15, 2026, in Delhi / India  *

The world is changing and has always been changing. The same can be said about the characteristics of emerging markets and the analysis of this increasingly important group of countries. This includes the aspects and judgments of financial markets.

The future of emerging market analysis

It seems to be a safe forecast that politics will remain very important for the future analysis of emerging markets – probably increasingly important in a longer perspective. In this context, the analysis of China’s and Russia’s ambitions in the emerging world could become particularly interesting – certainly also the activities of the U.S. in emerging countries. The future positioning of the EU in emerging countries seems to be uncertain. Altogether, geopolitical ambitions of the three global superpowers will most probably gain further momentum in the analysis of emerging markets. 

Future geopolitical ambitions of the superpowers can also be related to the availability of commodities – some of them more attractive to industrial producers around the world than others, with their ups and downs. An interesting question may be the future of rare metals which should be a crucial topic also for India. Furthermore: To what extent can certain commodities be substituted in the long run?

Another issue of general analytical interest should be to what extent Western corporations will make their supply chains less risky and move purchasing and production closer to friendly countries or their own geographical hemisphere. This has been partly the case more recently – but less dramatically than originally apprehended. Probably, this will be mostly a China-related question. The role of the U.S. remains uncertain in this context.

Closely linked to the domestic political area is also the development of institutions which have been neglected for a long time in emerging market analysis. But no responsible economist should continue to do so in the future. We should not forget the scientific conclusions of Nobel laureate Douglass North who clearly demonstrated the positive correlation between institutions and economic growth (North 1993).

 It should be added that also long-term trends in demography in combination with educational investments deserve more special attention in the analysis of emerging markets. Such an angle will be particularly illuminating when it, for example, comes to India with its promising demographic outlook. This relationship will become more frequently examined in the future, i.e. to what extent the population increase of India can be managed by corresponding efforts in education, particularly for the younger population.

Certain macroeconomic indicators like GDP, inflation, government debt etc will, of course, be carefully examined by analysts in the future as well – despite the statistical shortcomings that doubtless exist in many emerging countries. But it should also be recognized that pure macroeconomic analysis cannot be considered as sufficient anymore. Trustworthy emerging-market analysts should also follow microeconomic and financial developments in emerging countries. Improving and well-working financial markets can contribute so much to the performance of an emerging country.

The brief summary above on future main topics for the analysis of emerging markets points clearly at continuous analytical mergers between mainly politics, economics, finance on the one side and corporate management on the other side.

Having said this, one may also foresee that future anaIysis of emerging markets will  create further fields of special attention. I still believe that sociology and psychology play an underestimated role on global financial markets but also as regards the analysis of emerging markets as such. Analysts still can try harder to understand the messages and plans of the political leaders in the U.S., Russia and China which – in my view – is not possible without a better psychological understanding of their political leaders.

Finally, I also would like to mention another three areas that will matter in the future analysis of emerging markets. I am speaking about the future developments of investments in IT / AI, the environment and health care – i.e. the development and application of new technology. Will the divide in these areas between different emerging countries increase further? This is certainly something to observe in the future, too. Especially AI still contains – apart from obvious opportunities – a lot of unforeseeable risks and threats both globally and for single emerging market countries.

Is there a new risk for uncontrolled herd behavior coming from AI exuberance and AI application with thinkable severe consequences – also for the emerging world (see also Fromlet 2004)? Or should the risk of being insufficiently ambitious in AI development be considered as larger? What about the risks of a painful future digital divide among emerging countries? No one can answer these questions with reasonable probability – neither AI supporter and Nobel Prize winner from 2025, Philippe Aghion (Aghion and INSEAD 2025), nor AI sceptic and Nobel Prize winner from 2024, Daron Acemoglu (Dizikes 2025).   

Summary – new or changing fields of future emerging-market analysis The analysis of emerging markets has been changing substantially in the past and will do so in the future. The following examples that have been mentioned above as future keys and contributions to the analysis of emerging markets look as follows (without ranking):

Traditional analytical issues of the past but still crucial beyond 2026 
¤ well-known macroeconomic indicators, e.g. GDP, inflation, current account, debt, etc
¤ microeconomic and corporate trends (including supply chains)
¤ financial market developments 
¤ education on all levels  
¤ institutional improvements.                                                                                                                    

Increasingly important issues more recently and beyond 2026
¤ Politics
¤ For non-Indian analysts: the future rise of India (the Indians themselves know about it)
¤ China, Russia, the U.S. and their attempt to create a new world order
¤ investments in IT / AI,
¤ future risks for financial (AI) bubbles and AI divide in the (emerging) world 
¤ environmental policy  
¤ energy demand and production                       
¤ demography 
¤ psychology and sociology. 

Finally, I would like  to thank once again for the invitation to speak today at the IIF. I do wish India and the IIF all the best for the future. Such an interesting country and academic institution (Fromlet 2024) – always worth-while visiting, also for analysts. Watching the screens in a trading room should not be enough for foreign emerging market analysts for receiving a correct and fair impression of the Indian “continent”! 

Hubert Fromlet, Linnaeus University     

* The whole presentation will be published in the March number of “Finance India” (edited by IIF)

References:
Aghion , Ph and INSEAD Knowledge (2025), “Will our institutions keep up with AI? https://knowledge.insead.edu/economics-finance/will-our-institutions-keep-ai

Dizikes, P (2025), “A Nobel laureate on the economics of artificial intelligence”, MIT Technology Review        (MIT Alumni News: 77), https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/02/25/1111207/a-nobel-laureate-on-the-economics-of-artificial-intelligence/

Fromlet, H (2004), “The Run to China: Another Example of herd Behavior?”, Economic & Financial Review, no 1, pp 103-124

Fromlet, H (2024), “China vs India – who wins in the long run?”, China Research, Linnaeus University, https://blogg.lnu.se/china-research/?p=3582

North, D C (1993), “Economic Performance through Time”, Nobel Prize Lecture, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1993/north/lecture/

India and the EU agree on Free Trade

January 28, 2026

After 18 years of negotiations, India and the EU finally managed to conclude a deal on an important Free Trade Agreement (FTA), probably accelerated by President Trump’s irrational tariffs which had hit both India and the EU. More than 20 percent of global GDP is covered by this FTA and almost two billion people live in this gigantic area. India has the largest population in the world with very good growth rates in recent years. Since the EU so far failed to implement its trade deal with Mercosur, the FTA with India has also significant psychological importance for the future of the EU.

Declining tariffs or down to zero in the forthcoming decade

Obviously, European industry will benefit a lot from the gradually declining or disappearing tariffs, for as much as 96 percent of all European industrial products during the forthcoming decade. Good new business opportunities will mainly show up for European cars, aircrafts, machinery, etc. Indian exports will particularly be favored in industries like IT services, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, engineering goods, textiles, and jewels.

More recently, bilateral trade between the EU and India counted for about 180 billion euro. Agriculture is not included in the FTA which should make the still necessary European political approvement easier than it had been the case in the Mercosur process. Furthermore, another major advantage of the FTA is the strengthening of supply chains and the reduction of geopolitical vulnerability, indeed for both sides.

Model simulations show that the FTA could increase Indian exports to the EU by 41 percent and EU exports to India by 65 percent. This would lead to substantial income gains for both countries, according to the Kiel Institute (https://www.kielinstitut.de/publications/news/trade-agreement-eu-india-could-increase-bilateral-trade-by-up-to-65-percent/, https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-import/82e3902e-610e-46e7-9176-83e37af0d5ab-KPB202.pdf ).

However, India is not a country where business deals easily and quickly can be accomplished. The Indian business culture is very different from the European. This should be sincerely considered by European business people.

Below, I put together some articles on India that I have written in recent years :

“India – the next global superpower” – https://blogg.lnu.se/china-research/?p=3671 (2025)

“India – Modi wants to win the election and act as the voice of the South” – https://blogg.lnu.se/china-research/?p=3524 (2024)

“ India isn’t easy to analyze and deal with” – https://blogg.lnu.se/china-research/?p=3501 (2024)

“My impressions from (studying) India”- https://blogg.lnu.se/china-research/?p=3421 (2023)

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University