China Research

A discussion forum on emerging markets, mainly China – from a macro, micro, institutional and corporate angle.

Buying stocks in emerging markets

May 27, 2026

Currently, emerging markets are frequently suggested as interesting areas for financial portfolio investment, particularly since emerging markets as a group in 2025 managed to outperform stock markets in traditional OECD countries.

However, it should not be neglected that the analysis of emerging markets remains very difficult and needs quite some experience and understanding. Institutional, political and frequently also social shortcomings should be related to existing positive parameters in emerging countries. On the positive side, one may single out (mostly) decent or even good economic growth and comparative advantages such as young populations, low(er) labor costs compared to advanced countries, technological catch-up opportunities with improving productivity gains, and also commodity reserves.

Sources of misunderstanding

When trying to find emerging countries as a relevant area for financial portfolio investment, one can also discover quite a number of potential risks and traps. Some examples are summed up below.

# Emerging markets are not a homogenous group of countries – and certainly not even within the same continent either. For this reason, currency risks may differ from country to country. Currency developments may have a major impact on the return of an investment in foreign stock markets. This is why I always prefer to make my analysis country by country (even when there exist many similarities).

# Statistical shortcomings still can be found in most emerging countries; thus, the real state of the economy may look (somewhat) different from the positive impression that many times is given officially.

# Transparency in emerging countries may be insufficient also in other areas than statistics, for example to what extent existing good laws are applied consequently.

# In more general terms, one may point at the fact that institutional conditions may differ substantially between emerging countries despite similar growth rates of GDP. Institutions may have a major impact on the functionality of financial markets in different emerging countries which can induce a decisive disparities when analyzing prospects for GDP growth.

# Ethical and financial stability rules (regulations) and their application in the financial system should play an important role for foreign investors as well – but also the quality of banking managers.

# It should be observed, too, that stock markets themselves in emerging countries may have different degrees of development and maturity, for example when it comes to liquidity and traded stock volumes. Sometimes trade volumes are very low.

# Furthermore, the political system of an emerging market can make a difference as regards credibility and trust. This issue can also influence the social stability of an emerging country.

# Last but not least, historical experience may be relevant for investors’ psychological attitude vis-a-vis stock business in a certain emerging market. This psychological aspect should not be underestimated when considering the probable stability of Western portfolio investments in emerging countries.

Financial markets in the emerging world more recently*

My comments and conclusions above are certainly applicable to many emerging countries – but to a varying extent in both frequency and depth. At the same time, it may be interesting to look somewhat further into the recent performance of some relevant stock markets in the world of emerging countries – and to have some words on the potential long-term outlook.

Stock markets in emerging countries as a group have been experiencing rapid expansion more recently and particularly since 2025. They performed better than stock markets in  advanced countries, very much driven by AI in Asian countries and demand for commodities in other parts of the world – but also by geographical diversification strategies since the economic projections for the U.S. have become more uncertain.

Many experts believe these days – whatever this means – that emerging countries may achieve considerably higher equity returns over the next decade or so compared to more modest assumptions for the U.S. However, this positive outlook for emerging countries is very much based on continuous and undistorted progress in the infrastructure of AI, working commodity markets and political stability in mainly the U.S. and important Asian countries – something we currently do not know very much about.

We should also keep in mind that emerging countries still stand for only 12-13 percent of global stock market capitalization – but for the lion share of global GDP growth, i.e. around 70-75 percent more recently. These numbers may indicate a further structural long-term rise of stock-market capitalization in advanced emerging market countries.

*Further information on stock markets in emerging countries can be received by big financial firms, e.g. https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/e7613c4f-f16c-b039-f69a-fbdaafed579f, https://www.msci.com/eqb/gimi/stdindex/market_classification.html,                                                                             and also https://am.jpmorgan.com/gb/en/asset-management/per/insights/market-insights/market-updates/monthly-market-review/,                                                                                                            https://www.carmignac.com/en-gb/our-funds/fp-carmignac-emerging-markets-GB00BK1W2P36-a-gbp-acc.

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University

New Global Conditions for Emerging Market Analysis*

May 13, 2026

FINANCE INDIA © Indian Institute of Finance Vol. XL No. 1, March 2026 Pages—59—66

By HUBERT FROMLET, Linnaeus University / Sweden

Abstract

The world is changing and has always been. The same can be said about emerging markets and the analysis of their market reforms which were particularly visible in many former planned European economies. At the same time, herd behaviour is not easy to foresee under global conditions where psychology will play an increasingly important role also for the economic development.

2014 onwards, the analysis of emerging markets got a new dimension. Covid 19 meant a new puzzling analytical conundrum during a few years. Now, it seems to be a safe forecast that politics will remain very important for the future analysis of emerging markets – probably increasingly important in a longer perspective. In this context, the analysis of China’s and Russia’s ambitions in the emerging world could become particularly interesting (without discussing India’s strong potential in this specific paper). The activities of the U.S. in emerging countries certainly not to forget! The future positioning of the EU in emerging countries seems to be more uncertain.

Altogether, geopolitical ambitions of the three global superpower countries will most probably gain further momentum in the analysis of emerging markets.

*The Online access to the full paper is through Elsevier or EBSCO which may be possible by library agreements of certain universities.

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University

Different numbers on Chinese growth

April 28, 2026

Through many years, I have questioned the quality of Chinese official statistics. Sometimes, one can hear or read about statistical improvements. This may be partly the case – but who knows? Doubts are still in place, underlined by the competent research of BOFIT which is linked to the Finnish central bank, Suomen Pankki.

Worrisome domestic and global economic environment

According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in Beijing, Chinese GDP grew by 5 percent in Q1 of 2026 compared to Q1 last year. This is actually on the upper end of the growth objective of 4.5-5 percent for 2026 as a whole, despite all domestic and international distortions and wars. However, transparency of this development remains limited.

5 percent of economic growth in Q1 has been managed officially despite all the worrisome developments at home and internationally. GDP-growth rates remain unbelievably stable in China. Domestically, China is facing the the ageing population, the imbalanced property sector, major debt problems locally, and uncertain consumers – major challenges alongside all the technological achievements. On the other hand, official statistics also showed that investments and exports performed quite well in the beginning of 2026.

For example, exports grew by 20 percent to ASEAN countries (Q1 in value terms), by 32 percent to Africa and by 9 percent to Latin America. However, exports to the U.S. continued to decrease (-16 percent). 

Anyway, I still wonder for how long time or whether Chinese policy makers can continue to manage their dual economy simultaneously, the lagging and the leading one. An answer still cannot be given. 

The alternative calculation of BOFIT

Finnish research institute BOFIT (The Bank of Finland Research Institute for Emerging Economies, https://www.bofit.fi/en ) in Helsinki is well-known for its research on emerging economies, nowadays particularly on China, Russia and also the Ukraine. BOFIT publishes regularly important statistical indicators on these countries (https://www.bofit.fi/en/monitoring/statistics/) – but also an alternative China forecast on its own which contrary to NBS gave a slight slowdown in Q1 (https://www.bofit.fi/en/monitoring/statistics/alternativeindicatorsofchinaseconomicgrowth/). 

Nota bene: BOFIT’s next forecast on China will be published on May 5.

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University