China Research

A discussion forum on emerging markets, mainly China – from a macro, micro, institutional and corporate angle.

Advanced countries lose and emerging markets gain export momentum

October 29, 2025

Below, we examine the WTO statistics on the main exporting nations. Many advanced countries had quite bleak performances in 2024 due to weak global demand. Quite a number of emerging markets on the other hand achieved more favorable developments. The magnitude of trade damage caused by President Trump’s protectionism starting in 2025 remains to be seen.

China was still the largest exporting nation in the world after a 6-percent increase in current prices last year, giving the Middle Kingdom a global export share of almost 15 percent. This was partly made possible as a result of further Chinese progress in the emerging world, particularly in Africa and South America. China counts for roughly 7 percent of total global goods exports. For 2025, China is predicted to achieve record shipments in Africa, Latin America and Asia.

India remains lagging behind, Vietnam is catching up

Despite the enormous size of the country, India still has not advanced further than to number 18 of the globe’s leading exporting nations. This is sometimes regarded as disappointing. However, one should remember that India for a long time only had very limited foreign competition at home and for this reason insufficient conditions for exporting to the rest of the world on a broader scale of products. India as a country is still catching up also when it comes to exports and product diversification.

By the way, only a few emerging markets are among the top 20 exporting nations – but they dominate in the third group from number 21 to 30. Particularly in the medium and longer run, they will most probably improve their positions further.

In detail, the list of the 30 leading exporters of goods in 2024 looked as follows (in billion USD, in brackets all changes in percent and in current prices in, source WTO):

1    China 3577 (+6)   

2    U.S. 2065 (+2)

3    Germany 1682 (-1)

4    Netherlands 921 (-2)

5    Japan 707 (-1)

6    South Korea 684 (+8)

7    Italy 674 (0) 

8.   Hong Kong 64z6 (+12)

9     France 639 (+11)

10   Mexico 617 (+4)

11   UAE 604 (+6)

12   Canada 569 (0)

13    Belgium 536 (-6)

14    UK 513 (-2)

15    Singapore 506 (+6)

16    Taiwan 474 (+10)

17    Switzerland 447 (+6)

18    India 443 (+3)

19    Russia 433 (+2)

20    Spain 424 (0)

21    Vietnam 405 (+14)

22    Poland 380 (0)

23    Australia 341 (-8)

24    Brazil 337 (-1)

26    Malaysia 330 (+6)

26    Saudi Arabia 305 (-5)

27    Thailand 301 (+5)

2    Indonesia 265 (+2) 

29   Czech Republik 263 (+3)

30   Turkey 262 (+2)

Source: WTO.org

Asia in the lead regarding suppliers from emerging countries

Interestingly, Asian emerging countries had the most successful export performance in 2024 (but again, without knowing how much they are now affected by Trump’s ongoing protectionism). This position can be expected to remain in place in the foreseeable future. It also should be mentioned that particularly Vietnam benefited more recently from shifting global supply chains.

Surprisingly, Russia remained also in 2024 quite a successful exporting nation due to oil and gas exports to China, India and other countries still dealing substantially with Russia.

Conclusion: Trade statistics from the WTO remain illuminating, especially on the corporate level – for both purchasing, sales and production managers.

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University

U.S. tariff developments remain important to many emerging markets

August 21, 2025

Many emerging markets and less developed countries are closely linked to the development of the United States; according to my own definition emerging markets have taken more structural steps in a promising direction than all the clearly lagging developing countries in the world. Growth and market potential is simply more favorable in emerging economies.

This is why Western investors, financial and academic analysts often emphasize on emerging economies. I myself have been doing this for many years at Linnaeus University. Many analytical tools for the studies of emerging markets are similar to those being applied to advanced countries – but quite a number of these analytical tools are also different or have to be used additionally. For example, institutional conditions like transparency and the quality of statistics or ethics are different. But also the interpretation of widely published statistics – such as for GDP growth and inflation – differs normally between developed and less developed countries for the same statistical number.  

Examples of emerging countries are – when quoting the IMF (see https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO ) – in alphabetical order: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, South Africa, Turkey, and the Ukraine. So much in general terms.

Strong impact of the U.S. on emerging markets’ exports    

As much as one sixth of total exports from the emerging and developing world goes these days to the U.S. Many of these countries are, particularly hit by raised U.S. tariffs – also since tariffs for many of these countries have been raised unevenly. This could mean new conditions for competition.

Emerging countries for which the U.S. is the main market for their exports are listed in the following table (https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/exports-partners/). One could find there in 2023, for example, the U.S. as the number one export market for Mexico (76 % of total exports), Cambodia (36 %), Vietnam (28 %), Columbia (27% ), Sri Lanka (22 %), Ecuador (22 %), India (19 %), Thailand (18%), Bangladesh (16 %), Kenya (10 %) and as the number two market for Chile (16 %), Peru (14 %), The Philippines (13 %), Malaysia (12 %), Brazil (10%), Indonesia (9 %) and South Africa (8 %) among others.

Conclusion:  When looking at the tariffs that have been (preliminarily?) implemented by President Trump (see https://dimerco.com/news-press/us-tariff-update-2025/ ), one can recognize that the emerging markets quoted above (and many others) are heavily hit by the American protectionist tariffs – meaning a negative impact on the potential output of these emerging countries. Logically, the less developed countries are hoping that (more) free trade will come back not too far away – and so do many Western corporations which could benefit themselves from better export conditions of emerging countries to the U.S. Such a development would improve GDP growth in emerging countries and their future  inflow of new U.S. dollars for widened imports – and, thus, create improving Western market conditions in parts of the emerging market area as well.

Hubert Fromlet
Affiliate Professor at the School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University

“Secrets of Mexico’s Pacto”

June 7, 2013

Mexico has emerged as an emerging markets darling, with some editorials praising it as the “New China”. Is this a fair assessment? While it is true that Mexico’s wage cost competitiveness has improved relative to China, its broader productivity record has been very weak in recent years. Slow productivity growth has been limited by a lack of full implementation of earlier reforms, and difficulty in passing reforms in key remaining areas. The reform record of the past several months is encouraging — even astonishing — in its scope. Major reforms have been made to boost competition in telecoms, strengthen the education system, improve labor market flexibility and make local governments more accountable. Moreover, these reforms are not just incremental reforms: even “painful” and substantial constitutional changes are being passed, such as the telecommunications reform that was approved by state legislatures a few weeks ago. Many of these reforms the OECD has long advocated in its policy advice, notably in its Economic Surveys.

The gamut of reforms that have been passed makes one wonder what is the secret to all of this reform? A key part of the answer is its “Pacto por Mexico”, a consensus-based commitment to pass a package of reforms. This political vehicle has reduced the political opportunity cost of passing difficult reforms, by ensuring that all major parties take responsibility for their passage. The politically savvy technocrats who designed the Pacto include a number of former legislators, and their experience has helped immensely.

Economic growth has been too slow in recent decades to narrow the gap with the rest of the OECD, and it has been insufficiently inclusive to durably reduce poverty. This is mostly because the all-essential “multifactor” productivity has been a negative contributor to growth, after accounting for demographics and capital accumulation. In the long run, productivity should be the primary source of growth. Reversing the stagnation in the income gap with the rest of the OECD, and reducing income inequality will require “deep” structural reforms to address widespread informal employment and weaknesses in legal institutions, which diminish the effectiveness of many policies. These weaknesses particularly hold back gains in productivity, in part by limiting the scale of production and also by imposing barriers to reallocation.

While there is no silver bullet to eliminate informality, new OECD evidence presented in the latest Survey suggests that a broad package of reforms can help immensely: strengthening educational outcomes, improving the regulatory environment and reducing corruption are all essential intermediate steps to do so. New legislation and regulatory reform are needed to remove remaining barriers to market entry – especially at the sub-national levels – as well as reduce corruption and make the justice system more effective. While these goals are partly addressed in the Pacto’s commitments, policymakers must not be complacent, nor stop when the “going gets tough”. Ongoing reforms and follow-through are essential.

The OECD’s Survey recommends the creation of an ongoing high-level inter-agency body focused on productivity that can study and help to promote structural reform.

Boosting productivity and achieving the range of competition reforms envisioned by the administration will require stronger judicial institutions to enforce laws and adjudicate disputes. Judicial effectiveness relies not only on legal origin, but also on the efficiency of the court system, the quality of administration, the nature of legal codes and the soundness of procedures. Analysis carried out in the context of this Economic Survey suggests that a low-quality judiciary makes contract enforcement problematic, reducing the size of firms and capital intensity, thus limiting overall productivity through diminished economies of scale. Major reforms to the civil and criminal judicial systems are underway, yet faster progress needs to be strived for.

Those reforms that have been carried out in recent years have already improved Mexico’s macroeconomic performance, helping to support the economy’s solid recent growth record – which we believe will continue at a pace of about 3½ percent – and increased its resilience to repeated international shocks. However, it is critical that the reform efforts don’t slow down, and implementation is not forgotten. Mexico has no time to lose. In order to durably raise living standards and well-being for all Mexicans, many more reforms are still needed, and considerable follow-through or implementation of previous reforms is still required in most policy areas.

http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/mexico-2013.htm

 

 

 

 

 

Sean Dougherty
Senior Economist and Head of the OECD’s Mexico Desk

 


Back to Start Page